0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Çѱ¹Çü ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£±Ù¹«È¯°æ ÃøÁ¤µµ±¸ °³¹ß ¹× Æò°¡

Development and Validation of a Korean Nursing Work Environment Scale for Critical Care Nurses

ÀÓ»ó°£È£¿¬±¸ 2021³â 27±Ç 3È£ p.279 ~ 293
KMID : 1004620210270030279
ÀÌÈ¿Áø ( Lee Hyo-Jin ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing

¹®ÁöÇö ( Moon Ji-Hyun ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing
±è¼¼¶ó ( Kim Se-Ra ) - Asan Medical Center Department of Nursing
½É¹Ì¿µ ( Shim Mi-Young ) - Seoul National University Hospital Department of Nursing
±èÁ¤¿¬ ( Kim Jung-Yeon ) - Severance Hospital Division of Nursing
À̹̾֠( Lee Mi-Aie ) - Dongguk University College of Nursing

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº Çѱ¹Çü ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£±Ù¹«È¯°æ ÃøÁ¤ µµ±¸¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ°í, °³¹ßµÈ µµ±¸ÀÇ Å¸´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
¹æ¹ý: ¹®Çå °íÂû ¹× ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£»ç¿ÍÀÇ ½ÉÃþ ÀÎÅͺ並 ÅëÇØ 64°³ÀÇ Èĺ¸¹®Ç×À» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 64°³ Èĺ¸¹®Ç׿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»¿ëŸ´çµµ Æò°¡ ÈÄ ¼±Á¤µÈ 46°³ Ç׸ñÀ¸·Î ¿¹ºñµµ±¸¸¦ °³¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. 2021³â 2¿ùºÎÅÍ 3¿ù±îÁö 21°³ º´¿øÀÇ ÃÑ 535¸íÀÇ ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£»ç¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ¿¹ºñµµ±¸¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼³¹®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ÿ´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ´Â ±¸¼ºÅ¸´çµµ, ÁýÁߟ´çµµ, ÆǺ°Å¸´çµµ, ³»Àû ÀÏ°ü¼º ½Å·Úµµ, °Ë»ç-Àç°Ë»ç ½Å·Úµµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ¹®Ç׺м® ¹× Á÷Á¢ ¿Àºí¸®¹Î¹ýÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇÑ ÃÖ´ë¿ìµµ¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Å½»öÀû ¿äÀκм®À» ÅëÇØ 4°³ ¿äÀÎ 23°³ ¹®Ç×À» µµÃâÇÏ¿´°í, ¿äÀο¡ ÀÇÇÑ ´©ÀûºÐ»êºñÀ²Àº 55.6%¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. È®ÀÎÀû ¿äÀκм®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ¿äÀκÎÇÏ·®ÀÌ .50 ÀÌ»ó, ´ÙÁß»ó°üÀڽ°ªÀÌ .30 ÀÌ»óÀÇ Á¶°ÇÀ» ÃæÁ·ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â ¹®Ç×À» »èÁ¦ÇÑ ÈÄ KNWES-CCNÀº 4°³ ¿äÀÎ 21°³ Ç׸ñÀ¸·Î ¼±Á¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¸ðµ¨ÀûÇÕµµ Áö¼ö¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÑ °á°ú ±ÇÀå ¼öÁØÀ» ¸¸Á·ÇÏ¿© ¸ðµ¨ÀÌ ÀûÇÕÇÏ´Ù°í ÆÇ´ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù.(¥ö2=440.47(p<.001), CMIN/DF= 2.41, GFI=.86, SRMR=.06, RMSEA=.07, TLI=.90, CFI=.91). ¹®Ç× ÃÑÁ¡ °£ »ó°ü°ü°è´Â .32¿¡¼­ .73À̾ú°í, µµ±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ³»Àû ÀÏ°ü¼º ½Å·Úµµ Cronbach's ¥á=.92 ¿´´Ù. °Ë»ç-Àç°Ë»ç ½Å·ÚµµÀÇ »ó°ü°è¼ö´Â .72¿´À¸¸ç, ±Þ³»»ó°ü°è¼ö´Â .83À̾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: KNWES-CCNÀº Ÿ´çµµ¿Í ½Å·Úµµ°¡ È®ÀÎµÈ µµ±¸·Î Çѱ¹ ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç °£È£»çÀÇ °£È£ ¾÷¹« ȯ°æÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í °³¼±ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a Korean nursing work environment scale for critical care nurses (KNWES-CCN) and verify its validity and reliability.

Methods: A total of 46 preliminary items were selected using content validity analysis of experts on 64 candidate items derived through literature reviews and in-depth interviews with critical care nurses. 535 critical care nurses from 21 hospitals responded to the preliminary questionnaire from February to March 2021. The collected data were analysed using construct,convergent and discriminant validities, and internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Results: The 23 items in 4 factors accounted for 55.6% of the total variance were identified through item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). EFA was performed with maximum likelihood method including direct oblimin method. In the confirmatory factor analysis, KNWES-CCN consisted of 21 items in 4 factors by deleting the items that were not meet the condition that the factor loading over .50 or the squared multiple correlation over .30. Thismodel was considered to be suitable because it satisfied the fit index and acceptable criteria of the model [x2 =440.47(p<.001), CMIN/DF=2.41, GFI=.86, SRMR=.06, RMSEA=.07, TLI=.90, CFI=.91]. The item total correlation values ranged form .32 to .73 and its internal consistency was Cronbach's ¥á=.92. The reliability of the test-retest correlation coefficient was .72 and the intra-class correlation coefficient was .83.

Conclusion: The KNWES-CCN showed good validity and reliability. Therefore, it is expected that the use of this scale would measure and improve nursing work environment for critical care nurses in Korea.
KeyWords
ÁßȯÀÚ½Ç, °£È£»ç, ±Ù¹«, ȯ°æ, ÃøÁ¤
Intensive Care Units, Nurses, Work, Environment, Validation Studies as Topic
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI)